With so many meeting apps out there, it’s important to pick one that fits your business. This time, we’re looking at TL;DV and Laxis. TL;DV specializes in TL;DV and Laxis are both meet and offers ing assistant apps developed by TL;DV, Inc. and Laxis, respectively. Both apps were released in 2020. TL;DV offers a free plan and its paid plans start at $18 per month if billed yearly, or $29 per month if billed monthly. Laxis delivers TL;DV and Laxis are both meeting assistant apps developed by TL;DV, I and is built for nc. and Laxis, respectively. Both apps were released in 2020 and are available on Web, iOS, and Andr. TL;DV offers a free plan and its paid plans start at $18 per month if billed yearly, or $29 per month if billed monthly.
General Information
TL;DV and Laxis are both meeting assistant apps developed by TL;DV, Inc. and Laxis, respectively. Both apps were released in 2020 and are available on Web, iOS, and Android platforms.
Verdict:
Both TL;DV and Laxis are equally good in terms of general information.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| Developer/Company | TL;DV, Inc. | Laxis |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
| Platform Availability | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
Core Features
TL;DV offers a comprehensive suite of features for meeting management. It includes agenda setting, recording capabilities, and real-time transcription. The search functionality is robust, allowing for effective keyword searches. Export and sharing options are versatile, supporting multiple formats and easy sharing. Additionally, TL;DV supports both audio and video import.
Laxis, on the other hand, does not include agenda setting or recording features. It does provide real-time transcription and has good search functionality within transcripts. Export and sharing options are available in multiple formats. However, Laxis does not support audio or video import.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better: Yes, Yes, Yes, Effective keyword search, Multiple formats, easy sharing, Audio & Video.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| Agenda | Yes | No |
| Recording | Yes | No |
| Real-time Transcription | Yes | No |
| Search Functionality | Effective keyword search | Good search functionality within transcripts |
| Export & Sharing Options | Multiple formats, easy sharing | Supports exporting and sharing in multiple formats |
| Audio/Video Import | Audio & Video | No |
TL;DV Demo
Laxis Demo
Collaboration Tools
TL;DV and Laxis both offer robust collaboration tools, but they have some differences. TL;DV integrates with HubSpot, Slack, and Zapier, making it versatile for various workflows. Laxis also integrates with HubSpot but lacks Slack and Zapier integration.
In terms of language support, TL;DV supports 30 languages, while Laxis supports 36, giving Laxis a slight edge in this area. For demonstrations, TL;DV provides them on its official website, whereas Laxis offers them upon request.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better due to broader integration options and available demonstrations on the official website.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot Integration | Yes | Yes |
| Slack Integration | Yes | No |
| Zapier Integration | Yes | No |
| Language Support | Supports 30 languages | Supports 36 languages |
| Demonstrations | Available on the official website | On request |
Integration and Compatibility
TL;DV and Laxis both offer strong integration and compatibility features. TL;DV integrates seamlessly with popular platforms like Zoom and Google Meet, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows. Laxis also provides robust integration options, supporting platforms such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams, ensuring broad compatibility.
In terms of UI design, TL;DV boasts a modern, intuitive interface that enhances user experience. Laxis, on the other hand, features a modern UI with easy navigation, making it straightforward for users to find and use its features.
When it comes to mobile accessibility, TL;DV is accessible on mobile platforms, allowing users to manage meetings on the go. Laxis is fully accessible on mobile, offering comprehensive functionality across devices.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better in Integration and Compatibility. Laxis has a more intuitive UI and better mobile accessibility.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| UI Design | Modern, intuitive | Modern UI with easy navigation |
| Mobile Accessibility | Accessible on mobile platforms | Fully accessible on mobile |
Security and Privacy
TL;DV and Laxis offer different levels of security and privacy for meeting assistants. TL;DV does not provide end-to-end encryption, while Laxis does. Both apps comply with GDPR regulations, ensuring a baseline of data protection. TL;DV also adheres to CCPA and encrypts data both at rest and in transit. On the other hand, Laxis is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant, which indicates a higher standard of security controls. In summary, Laxis offers end-to-end encryption and SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, whereas TL;DV focuses on GDPR, CCPA, and comprehensive data encryption.
Verdict:
Laxis is better: Yes, GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type 2, data encryption.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| End-to-End Encryption | No | Yes |
| Security & Privacy | GDPR, CCPA, Encrypted data at rest and in transit | GDPR compliant, SOC 2 Type 2, data encryption |
User Experience
TL;DV offers a very easy user experience, making it accessible for users with minimal technical skills. It is reliable with good performance, ensuring smooth operation during meetings. The app is scalable for individuals and small teams, making it suitable for startups and small businesses. Customer support is available via email and help desk, providing adequate assistance when needed. Overall, TL;DV delivers strong performance, ensuring a seamless experience.
Laxis, on the other hand, is easy to use, though it may require a bit more familiarity compared to TL;DV. It is generally reliable, performing well in most scenarios. Laxis is scalable for various business sizes, making it a versatile option for both small and large enterprises. Customer support is provided through email, and a help center is available for additional resources. The app shows strong performance with minimal issues, ensuring a dependable user experience.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better in terms of User Experience.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | Very Easy | Easy |
| Reliability | Reliable with good performance | Generally reliable |
| Scalability | Scalable for individuals and small teams | Scalable for various business sizes |
| Customer Support | Email and help desk support | Email support, help center available |
| Performance | Strong, good overall performance | Strong performance with minimal issues |
Pricing
TL;DV offers a free plan and its paid plans start at $18 per month if billed yearly, or $29 per month if billed monthly. It also provides a free plan and has a clear onboarding process to help users get started easily.
Laxis also has a free plan, with paid plans starting at $13.33 per month when billed yearly, or $15.99 per month if billed monthly. Laxis offers a free trial and an easy onboarding process to ensure users can quickly become familiar with the app.
Both TL;DV and Laxis provide free plans and straightforward onboarding, making them accessible for new users. However, Laxis has a lower starting price for its paid plans compared to TL;DV.
Verdict:
Laxis is better in terms of pricing.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan available, paid starts at $18/month (yearly) $29/month (monthly) |
Free plan available, Paid plan starts at $13.33/month (yearly) $15.99 month (monthly) |
| Trial and Onboarding | Free plan available and clear onboarding process | Free trial available, easy onboarding |
User Feedback and Reviews
TL;DV boasts an overall rating of 4.8/5, reflecting its strong user feedback. Users appreciate its accuracy, user-friendly interface, and good integration capabilities. However, it is limited to certain platforms and lacks full encryption, which some users find concerning.
Laxis, on the other hand, has an overall rating of 4.2/5. It is praised for its accurate transcriptions and ease of use. Despite these strengths, users note that it lacks advanced features, which can be a drawback for those seeking more comprehensive functionality.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better with a higher rating of 4.8/5 and more pros compared to Laxis’s 4.2/5 rating.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Laxis |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Ratings | 4.8/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Pros | Accurate, user-friendly, good integration | Accurate transcriptions, Easy |
| Cons | Limited to certain platforms, no full encryption | Limited advanced features |
