Wondering how TL;DV and Fathom compare? We’re here to give you the lowdown on their features and . TL;DV stands out for its TL;DV, developed by TL;DV, Inc., and Fathom, crea, making it a great fit for small businesses. TL;DV and Fathom both offer free plans, making them accessible for users who want to try out their basic features. Fathom delivers TL;DV, developed by TL;DV, Inc., and Fathom, created by Fathom, Inc., and is built for both launched in 2020. TL;DV is available on Web, iOS, and Android platforms, offering users flexib. TL;DV and Fathom both offer free plans, making them accessible for users who want to try out their basic features.
General Information
TL;DV, developed by TL;DV, Inc., and Fathom, created by Fathom, Inc., both launched in 2020. TL;DV is available on Web, iOS, and Android platforms, offering users flexibility across devices. In contrast, Fathom is accessible via Web and as a Chrome Extension, catering primarily to desktop users. Both apps aim to enhance meeting productivity, but their platform availability differs, with TL;DV providing broader device compatibility.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better due to broader platform availability: Web, iOS, Android vs Web, Chrome Extension.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Developer/Company | TL;DV, Inc. | Fathom, Inc. |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
| Platform Availability | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Chrome Extension |
Core Features
TL;DV and Fathom both offer core features that enhance meeting productivity. Both apps support agenda creation and recording capabilities. TL;DV stands out with real-time transcription, allowing users to follow along with the meeting as it happens, while Fathom lacks this feature.
When it comes to search functionality, TL;DV provides effective keyword search, making it easy to find specific information quickly. Fathom offers effective search within transcriptions, which can be useful for reviewing detailed meeting notes.
Both apps excel in export and sharing options, supporting multiple formats and easy sharing. However, TL;DV has an edge with its ability to import both audio and video files, whereas Fathom does not support this feature.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better due to real-time transcription and audio/video import capabilities.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Agenda | Yes | Yes |
| Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Real-time Transcription | Yes | No |
| Search Functionality | Effective keyword search | Effective search within transcriptions |
| Export & Sharing Options | Multiple formats, easy sharing | Multiple formats, easy sharing |
| Audio/Video Import | Audio & Video | No |
TL;DV Demo
Fathom Demo
Collaboration Tools
TL;DV and Fathom both offer robust collaboration tools, making them strong contenders in the meeting assistant app market. Both apps integrate seamlessly with HubSpot, Slack, and Zapier, ensuring smooth workflows and enhanced productivity. TL;DV supports 30 languages, slightly edging out Fathom, which supports 28 languages. Demonstrations for both apps are readily available on their official websites, allowing users to explore their features before committing.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better with support for 30 languages compared to Fathom’s 28 languages.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot Integration | Yes | Yes |
| Slack Integration | Yes | Yes |
| Zapier Integration | Yes | Yes |
| Language Support | Supports 30 languages | Supports 28 languages |
| Demonstrations | Available on the official website | Available on the official website |
Integration and Compatibility
TL;DV and Fathom are both meeting assistant apps with distinct features. In terms of Integration and Compatibility, TL;DV integrates seamlessly with popular video conferencing tools like Zoom and Google Meet, ensuring smooth operation within these platforms. Fathom also offers robust integration capabilities, particularly excelling with Zoom, making it a reliable choice for users who frequently use this platform.
Regarding UI Design, TL;DV boasts a modern, intuitive interface that enhances user experience by being straightforward and easy to use. Fathom, on the other hand, features a modern design that is also easy to navigate, ensuring users can quickly find and use the tools they need without hassle.
Both apps are accessible on mobile platforms, allowing users to manage their meetings and access features on the go. This mobile accessibility ensures that users can stay connected and productive, regardless of their location.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better in Integration and Compatibility. Both have modern UI design and mobile accessibility.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| UI Design | Modern, intuitive | Modern and easy to navigate |
| Mobile Accessibility | Accessible on mobile platforms | Accessible on mobile platforms |
Security and Privacy
TL;DV and Fathom both prioritize security and privacy, though they approach it differently. Neither app offers end-to-end encryption. TL;DV complies with GDPR and CCPA regulations, ensuring data is encrypted both at rest and in transit. Fathom also adheres to GDPR standards and emphasizes data minimization, with encrypted storage to protect user information. Both apps demonstrate a commitment to safeguarding user data, but their specific security measures and privacy practices vary slightly.
Verdict:
TL;DV is better due to compliance with both GDPR and CCPA.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| End-to-End Encryption | No | No |
| Security & Privacy | GDPR, CCPA, Encrypted data at rest and in transit | GDPR, Data minimization, encrypted storage |
User Experience
TL;DV and Fathom both offer a user-friendly experience, making them very easy to use. TL;DV is reliable with good performance, while Fathom boasts high reliability and consistent performance. TL;DV is scalable for individuals and small teams, whereas Fathom scales well for both individuals and businesses. In terms of customer support, TL;DV provides email and help desk support, while Fathom offers email support and a help center. Performance-wise, TL;DV delivers strong, good overall performance, whereas Fathom excels with excellent performance overall.
Verdict:
Fathom is better due to high reliability, scalability for businesses, and excellent overall performance.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | Very Easy | Very Easy |
| Reliability | Reliable with good performance | High reliability with consistent performance |
| Scalability | Scalable for individuals and small teams | Scalable for individuals and businesses |
| Customer Support | Email and help desk support | Email support, help center available |
| Performance | Strong, good overall performance | Excellent performance overall |
Pricing
TL;DV and Fathom both offer free plans, making them accessible for users who want to try out their basic features. For those looking for more advanced functionalities, TL;DV’s paid plans start at $18 per month if billed yearly, or $29 per month if billed monthly. On the other hand, Fathom’s paid plans are slightly more affordable, starting at $15 per month when billed yearly, and $19 per month when billed monthly.
In terms of trial and onboarding, TL;DV provides a free plan and a clear onboarding process, making it easy for new users to get started. Fathom also offers a free trial and boasts an easy onboarding process, ensuring that users can quickly become familiar with the app’s features.
Verdict:
Fathom is better in terms of pricing.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan available, paid starts at $18/month (yearly) $29/month (monthly) |
Free plan available, paid starts at $15/month (yearly) $19/month (monthly) |
| Trial and Onboarding | Free plan available and clear onboarding process | Free trial available, easy onboarding |
User Feedback and Reviews
TL;DV and Fathom both receive high praise from users, each boasting an overall rating of 4.8 out of 5. Users appreciate TL;DV for its accuracy, user-friendly interface, and good integration capabilities. However, it is limited to certain platforms and lacks full encryption. Similarly, Fathom is noted for its high accuracy, easy integration, and great features. It also faces limitations in platform support and does not offer full encryption. Both apps are well-regarded but share some common drawbacks.
Verdict:
Both have 4.8/5 ratings. TL;DV is user-friendly; Fathom has great features. Both have similar cons. Equally good.
| Attribute | TL;DV | Fathom |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Ratings | 4.8/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Pros | Accurate, user-friendly, good integration | Highly accurate, easy integration, great features |
| Cons | Limited to certain platforms, no full encryption | Limited platform support, no full encryption |
