Which meeting assistant app is best for you? We’re taking a closer look at Fathom and Rewind to help you decide. Fathom delivers Fathom, developed by Fathom, Inc., was released in 2020. It is availa and shines in ble as a web application and a Chrome extension. Rewind, created by Rewind Software, Inc., has been . Fathom offers a free plan and its paid plans start at $15 per month if billed yearly, or $19 per month if billed monthly. Rewind is ideal for Fathom, developed by Fathom, Inc., was released i, offering strong features for n 2020. It is available as a web application and a Chrome extension. Rewind, created by Rewind Softw. Fathom offers a free plan and its paid plans start at $15 per month if billed yearly, or $19 per month if billed monthly.
General Information
Fathom, developed by Fathom, Inc., was released in 2020. It is available as a web application and a Chrome extension. Rewind, created by Rewind Software, Inc., has been around since 2015. It supports multiple platforms, including Mac, iOS, and Windows.
Verdict:
Rewind is better due to broader platform availability and earlier release date.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| Developer/Company | Fathom, Inc. | Rewind Software, Inc. |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2015 |
| Platform Availability | Web, Chrome Extension | Mac, iOS, Windows |
Core Features
Fathom and Rewind both offer essential features for meeting assistance. Both apps support creating agendas and recording meetings. However, neither provides real-time transcription. Fathom stands out with its effective search functionality within transcriptions, making it easier to find specific information. Rewind lacks a dedicated search feature, which might make navigating past meetings more cumbersome. Both apps allow exporting and sharing in multiple formats, ensuring flexibility in how users manage their meeting data. Neither app supports audio or video import.
Verdict:
Fathom is better due to its effective search within transcriptions.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| Agenda | Yes | Yes |
| Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Real-time Transcription | No | No |
| Search Functionality | Effective search within transcriptions | No dedicated search functionality |
| Export & Sharing Options | Multiple formats, easy sharing | Multiple formats, easy sharing |
| Audio/Video Import | No | No |
Fathom Demo
Rewind Demo
Collaboration Tools
Fathom and Rewind offer distinct collaboration tools. Fathom integrates seamlessly with HubSpot, Slack, and Zapier, making it versatile for various workflows. In contrast, Rewind lacks these integrations, which might limit its utility for some users.
When it comes to language support, Rewind stands out by supporting 57 languages, compared to Fathom’s 28 languages. This makes Rewind a better option for international teams needing extensive language options.
Regarding demonstrations, Fathom provides detailed demos on its official website, offering a clear understanding of its features. Rewind also has a demo video, but it is less informative, which might not be as helpful for potential users looking to explore its capabilities.
Verdict:
Fathom is better: HubSpot Integration: Yes, Slack Integration: Yes, Zapier Integration: Yes, Language Support: 28, Demonstrations: Available.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot Integration | Yes | No |
| Slack Integration | Yes | No |
| Zapier Integration | Yes | No |
| Language Support | Supports 28 languages | Supports 57 languages |
| Demonstrations | Available on the official website | Demo video available, not that informative |
Integration and Compatibility
Fathom and Rewind are two meeting assistant apps with distinct features. In terms of integration and compatibility, Fathom excels by offering seamless integration with various platforms, making it highly adaptable for different workflows. Rewind, on the other hand, provides robust compatibility but may not integrate as smoothly with as many platforms as Fathom.
When it comes to UI design, both apps offer modern and easy-to-navigate interfaces. Fathom’s design is intuitive, allowing users to quickly access features and manage meetings efficiently. Rewind also boasts a modern, easy-to-navigate interface, ensuring users can easily find and use its functionalities.
Regarding mobile accessibility, Fathom is accessible on mobile platforms, providing flexibility for users who need to manage meetings on the go. Rewind, however, is primarily accessible on the web and does not have a dedicated mobile app, which may limit its usability for mobile-dependent users.
Verdict:
Fathom is better in Integration and Compatibility. Rewind has a better UI Design. Fathom is better in Mobile Accessibility.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| UI Design | Modern and easy to navigate | Modern, easy-to-navigate interface |
| Mobile Accessibility | Accessible on mobile platforms | Accessible on web; no dedicated mobile app |
Security and Privacy
Fathom and Rewind differ significantly in their approach to security and privacy. Fathom does not offer end-to-end encryption, while Rewind does. Both apps comply with GDPR, but Rewind also adheres to CCPA and is SOC 2 compliant, indicating a higher standard of security practices. Fathom focuses on data minimization and encrypted storage, ensuring that only necessary data is collected and stored securely. Rewind, on the other hand, emphasizes data encryption and comprehensive security measures.
Verdict:
Rewind is better with Yes, GDPR, CCPA, Data encryption, SOC 2 compliant.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| End-to-End Encryption | No | Yes |
| Security & Privacy | GDPR, Data minimization, encrypted storage | GDPR, CCPA, Data encryption, SOC 2 compliant |
User Experience
Fathom offers a very easy user experience, making it accessible for users of all skill levels. It boasts high reliability with consistent performance, ensuring smooth operations. Fathom is scalable for both individuals and businesses, making it versatile. Customer support is available through email and a help center, providing adequate assistance. Overall, Fathom delivers excellent performance.
Rewind, on the other hand, provides a moderate ease of use, which might require a bit more effort to navigate. It is generally reliable but can experience slowdowns at times. Rewind is scalable for various business sizes, catering to a broader range of users. Customer support includes email and a knowledge base, offering helpful resources. Rewind maintains consistent performance, especially for backup and restoration tasks.
Verdict:
Fathom is better in terms of User Experience.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | Very Easy | Moderate |
| Reliability | High reliability with consistent performance | Generally reliable but can be slow at times |
| Scalability | Scalable for individuals and businesses | Scalable for various business sizes |
| Customer Support | Email support, help center available | Email and knowledge base support available |
| Performance | Excellent performance overall | Consistent performance for backup and restoration |
Pricing
Fathom offers a free plan and its paid plans start at $15 per month if billed yearly, or $19 per month if billed monthly. Rewind’s pricing starts at $5 per month, but it varies depending on the platform. Both Fathom and Rewind provide a free trial and have easy onboarding processes.
Verdict:
Rewind is better in terms of pricing, starting at $5/month compared to Fathom’s $15/month.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan available, paid starts at $15/month (yearly) $19/month (monthly) |
Pricing starts at $5/month, varies by platform |
| Trial and Onboarding | Free trial available, easy onboarding | Free trial available, easy onboarding |
User Feedback and Reviews
Fathom has an overall rating of 4.8/5, praised for its high accuracy, easy integration, and great features. However, it faces criticism for limited platform support and lack of full encryption.
Rewind holds an overall rating of 4.6/5, known for its reliability, easy integration, and automated backups. Users have noted limited customer support and occasional restore delays as drawbacks.
Verdict:
Fathom is better with an overall rating of 4.8/5, highly accurate, and great features despite limited platform support.
| Attribute | Fathom | Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Ratings | 4.8/5 | 4.6/5 |
| Pros | Highly accurate, easy integration, great features | Reliable, easy integration, automated backups |
| Cons | Limited platform support, no full encryption | Limited customer support, occasional restore delays |
